Archives
Is Google-Alerts a chatterbot?
Submitted by Erik Petersen on Tue, 19/02/2008 - 12:38. general software testing | perspectivesI know Google like to really push the boundaries developing software, but I must admit I was surprised to note at the bottom of an alert there was a link “Invite Google Alerts to chat”. Wow, what was this? I clicked the link, then was disappointed to see the email account was a noreply one. I was shattered. [grin] Suggestion for Google Central, Don’t invite Gmail chats with noreply email addresses.
Many eons ago (well a few decades at least) I used to try chats with Eliza, an early chatterbot. She also now lives (as antique software) on my HTC Touch PDA. It is an interesting testing challenge to try to confuse a chatterbot. It is quite easy for Eliza. There are many others to try out here . I am sure Ms. Google Alerts would be hard to confuse, if she ever finds her voice. She still hasn’t replied to my invite to chat either…
Write All Your Logic In JavaScript and SQL (And Other Really Bad Ideas)
Submitted by jason@parlezuml.com (Jason Gorman) on Tue, 19/02/2008 - 13:27.Thank you for taking the time to reply.
Thanks for correcting me. I see now that you and I are in direct opposition, as were Galileo and the Catholic Church **smile**. Your approach results in 90% too much code in my opinion, and is not nearly as scalable as my SQLAjax approach.
Does a set of irrefutable test axioms exist?
Submitted by Paul Gerrard's Blog on Tue, 19/02/2008 - 14:49.Is it possible to define a set of axioms that provide a framework for testing that all the variations of test approach currently being advocated align with or obey? In this respect, an axiom would be an uncontested principle; something self-evidently and so obviously true and not requiring proof. What would such test axioms look like?
Wireshark 0.99.8pre1 is released
Submitted by Opensourcetesting.org - latest news on Tue, 19/02/2008 - 21:14.Soapui, Selenium, And Pushtotest In A 3-Day Bootcamp
Submitted by Opensourcetesting.org - latest news on Tue, 19/02/2008 - 21:17.An occasional alternative to mocks?
Submitted by Brian Marick on Tue, 19/02/2008 - 21:43.Etymology of "Foo"
Submitted by Corey Goldberg on Tue, 19/02/2008 - 22:43."Foo" is my favorite word. I use it all over the place. When programming, it is the name of my quick junk files... it is a temporary variable name while i figure out code. We programmers love our foo.
For those that want the origins and etymology, there is a great RFC about it:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3092.txt
The 12 Axioms of Testing
Submitted by Paul Gerrard's Blog on Tue, 19/02/2008 - 23:38.Well, here they are - my proposed set of testing axioms.
Mockito - mocking java simpler & better
Submitted by webmaster@testdriven.com (News) on Wed, 20/02/2008 - 04:35.WebTest 2.0: better AJAX and plain selenium scripts
Submitted by webmaster@testdriven.com (News) on Wed, 20/02/2008 - 04:36.A revolutionary test management system
Submitted by webmaster@testdriven.com (Links) on Wed, 20/02/2008 - 04:36.http://www.getzephyr.com
