TestNG and JUnit 4 compared
TestNG and JUnit 4 compared
Submitted by webmaster@testdriven.com (News) on Sat, 02/09/2006 - 15:22.Still the most popular link on testdriven.com, Cédric Beust's versatile java unit-testing tool, TestNG, made the highlights on IBM DeveloperWorks last Tuesday, with Andrew Glover's article, JUnit 4 vs. TestNG: Why TestNG is still the better framework for large-scale testing.
Abstract: "With its new, annotations-based framework, JUnit 4 has embraced some of the best features of TestNG, but does that mean it's rendered TestNG obsolete? Andrew Glover considers what's unique about each framework and reveals three high-level testing features you'll still find only in TestNG."
Abstract: "With its new, annotations-based framework, JUnit 4 has embraced some of the best features of TestNG, but does that mean it's rendered TestNG obsolete? Andrew Glover considers what's unique about each framework and reveals three high-level testing features you'll still find only in TestNG."
